Tag: DigitalCulture

  • The Praise-Driven Society: Recognition and Self-Worth in the Digital Age

    People gathered in a circle sharing collective recognition

    1. Why Praise Feels So Sweet

    1.1. Recognition as a Psychological Need

    Humans are inherently social beings, and recognition from others plays a key role in emotional stability.
    Psychologist Abraham Maslow identified esteem—the need to feel valued and respected—as a fundamental psychological requirement, not a luxury.

    Praise, therefore, is more than a polite gesture.
    It activates the brain’s reward system by stimulating dopamine release, creating a sense of reassurance and satisfaction that reinforces behavior.

    1.2. When Validation Replaces Self-Satisfaction

    The problem begins when this reward is experienced too frequently and too predictably.
    Instead of drawing satisfaction from personal goals or internal standards, individuals may begin to depend on external reactions.

    Over time, self-worth shifts outward—measured less by inner conviction and more by how others respond.

    2. When Praise Turns Into Numbers

    In the past, praise came mostly from intimate relationships—family, friends, teachers, or colleagues.
    Today, recognition is quantified.

    Likes, shares, views, and follower counts turn approval into numbers that can be tracked in real time.
    A photo that receives two hundred likes feels validating.
    A similar post that receives far fewer may quietly undermine confidence.

    A hand holding a smartphone surrounded by abstract like icons

    What changes is not the content itself, but the perceived value of the self behind it.
    Meaning gives way to metrics.


    3. The Shadow Side of Praise Addiction

    Praise can motivate—but when overconsumed, it creates unintended consequences.

    • Loss of internal standards: Behavior begins to follow approval rather than personal values.
    • Comparison anxiety: Constant exposure to others’ metrics fuels insecurity and relative deprivation.
    • Distorted relationships: People curate themselves to be praised rather than understood.

    For example, when a student studies primarily to receive praise, motivation often collapses once external validation disappears.
    The reward replaces the purpose.


    4. Where Genuine Praise Comes From

    Not all praise is harmful.
    The difference lies in intent and focus.

    • Unconditional praise affirms existence and effort (“You matter,” “I see you trying”).
    • Performance-based praise centers on outcomes and results (“You scored high,” “This performed well”).

    Research suggests that unconditional recognition strengthens self-efficacy and long-term motivation.
    By contrast, praise tied solely to performance can increase stress and fear of failure.


    5. Escaping the Praise Trap

    Resisting praise addiction does not require rejecting recognition altogether.
    It requires balance.

    Strengthening internal motivation

    Focus on goals defined by personal meaning rather than external reaction.
    Exercise for how the body feels, not how it looks online.

    Creating digital distance

    Not every achievement needs to be shared.
    Some experiences gain depth when kept private—written in a journal or shared with one trusted person.

    A solitary figure in quiet light reflecting on inner worth

    Conclusion

    Praise is a necessary psychological nutrient.
    But in the digital age, its overconsumption risks turning nourishment into dependency.

    What we ultimately seek is not endless affirmation, but the ability to recognize ourselves without constant applause.
    Beyond the numbers, beyond the metrics, genuine recognition still lives in honest relationships—and in the quiet confidence of self-acceptance.


    References

    1. Deci, E. L.,, & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Springer.
      → Distinguishes intrinsic motivation from external rewards, explaining how praise dependence can weaken autonomy and long-term motivation.
    2. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The Narcissism Epidemic. New York: Free Press.
      → Analyzes how digital culture amplifies recognition-seeking behavior and reshapes self-esteem in modern societies.
    3. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(2), 200–209.
      → Empirically demonstrates how online feedback affects self-worth and recognition needs, particularly among younger users.
  • The Age of Overexposure: Why Do We Turn Ourselves into Products?

    Why do we feel compelled to show ourselves in order to exist?

    A figure surrounded by camera flashes in a neon-lit city, symbolizing self commodification

    1. “If You Are Not Seen, You Feel as If You Do Not Exist”

    Under the constant flash of social media, the self gradually becomes an image.
    And that image, in turn, begins to define who we are.

    There is a scene I often notice in cafés.

    Two friends sit across from each other, yet they spend more time facing their camera screens than one another.
    They adjust facial angles, background lighting, and filters—sometimes for several minutes.

    Once the photo is posted, their eyes immediately turn to the numbers:
    likes, comments, reactions.

    Instead of conversation, the space between them fills with unspoken questions:

    How do I look?
    What will people think?

    Our era whispers to us relentlessly:

    If you are not visible, you do not exist.
    If you are not visible, you are falling behind.
    If you are not visible, you are no one.

    At what point did self-expression stop being expression—and become self-marketing?


    2. Why Does Social Media Turn Us into “Products”?

    2.1 The Attention Economy: When Attention Becomes Currency

    TikTok, Instagram, Reels, YouTube Shorts—
    all compete for momentary attention.

    In this system, we do not only sell content.
    We sell ourselves along with it.

    Likes resemble price tags.
    Comments feel like consumer feedback.
    Follower counts begin to look like brand value.

    The self becomes measurable.


    2.2 Self-Branding: Packaging the Self

    “Knowing how to present yourself” is now treated as a skill—and an asset.

    The problem is not presentation itself,
    but the fact that the package increasingly matters more than the person inside it.

    What was once a tool becomes a standard of worth.


    2.3 Algorithms and the Logic of Exposure

    Algorithms are simple:

    The more stimulating something is, the more it spreads.
    The more it spreads, the more it is rewarded.

    Social media quietly teaches us one rule:

    Reveal a little more. Then you will be remembered.


    Digital faces displayed on a city billboard, representing identities consumed as content

    3. Why Do We Consume One Another Like Products?

    3.1 Byung-Chul Han: The Performance Society

    In The Burnout Society, Byung-Chul Han argues that modern individuals constantly turn themselves into projects—measured by performance and visibility.

    As a result, relationships shift.

    They are no longer about encountering a person,
    but about consuming outcomes.

    We scroll through others as content,
    and others scroll through us in return.


    3.2 Bourdieu: The Market of Symbolic Capital

    Through Pierre Bourdieu’s framework, social media appears as a battlefield of symbolic capital.

    Age, appearance, profession, taste, emotional expression—
    all become resources to be evaluated and ranked.

    Within this system, an unspoken rule emerges:

    You must learn to sell yourself better.


    3.3 Foucault: When Surveillance Becomes Internal

    Michel Foucault described modern power as a system that makes individuals discipline themselves.

    Social media is precisely such a space.

    Before anyone else judges how we look,
    we examine ourselves first.

    At that moment, we are no longer simply expressing ourselves.
    We become our own supervisors—
    and our own editors.


    4. Conclusion: Beyond Visibility, Toward Existence

    A quiet figure by a window at dawn, symbolizing a return from visibility to existence

    The age of overexposure urges us to define ourselves by how we appear to others.

    Yet visibility is not existence.
    Packaging is not essence.

    Exposure does not deepen relationships.
    Often, it produces a more profound loneliness.

    The question is no longer vague:

    Do we want to be seen more,
    or do we want to exist more deeply?

    Returning from the “visible self” to the “lived self” requires courage—
    more courage than constant exposure ever does.

    And that courage does not begin with dramatic gestures,
    but with a quiet permission:

    Allowing ourselves moments that do not need to be shown at all.


    References

    Han, Byung-Chul. (2010). The Transparency Society. Stanford University Press.
    → Han analyzes how the obsession with transparency leads individuals to voluntarily overexpose themselves, participating in systems of surveillance and self-commodification. His work provides a crucial framework for understanding overexposure in the digital age.

    Foucault, Michel. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books.
    → Foucault explains how modern power operates through surveillance that individuals internalize. His theory directly illuminates how social media users monitor and regulate their own self-presentation.

    Bourdieu, Pierre. (1986). The Forms of Capital. Greenwood.
    → Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic capital helps explain why individuals in social media environments feel compelled to package and market their identities as competitive assets.

    Goffman, Erving. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.
    → Goffman’s theory of social performance provides the foundational lens for interpreting self-branding and identity management on digital platforms.

    Turkle, Sherry. (2011). Alone Together. Basic Books.
    → Turkle critiques how digital technologies create the illusion of connection while deepening isolation, reinforcing the paradox of overexposure without intimacy.